FDA developed this document to provide guidance to industry and FDA staff about current review practices for premarket notification (510(k)) submissions. The intent of this guidance is to identify, explain, and clarify each of the critical decision points in the decision-making process FDA uses to determine substantial equivalence. This guidance is not intended to implement significant policy changes to the current 510(k) review process. Rather, the intent of this guidance is to enhance the predictability, consistency, and transparency of the 510(k) program by describing in greater detail the regulatory framework, policies, and practices underlying FDA’s 510(k) review.
The draft of this guidance document contained sections addressing FDA’s Special and Abbreviated 510(k) programs. FDA intends to finalize those sections separately. Until FDA issues new final recommendations on the Special and Abbreviated 510(k) programs, the recommendations for Special and Abbreviated 510(k)s contained in “The New 510(k) Paradigm – Alternate Approaches to Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications,” dated March 20, 1998, (http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm080187.htm) remain in effect.
FDA’s guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not required.[gview file=”https://www.orthospinenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/FDA-510K-Guidance.pdf” save=”1″]